viernes, 12 de enero de 2007

Introduction To Teaching Practice


These is the final Essay I wrote for my Introduction to Teaching Practice Class.



It's about the Eliciting technique used in the classrooms.




Eliciting

When we think of traditional teaching, we’re probably thinking about a teacher standing in front of the class talking and talking and writing down important information on the blackboard, perhaps even dictating a whole lesson while the students are writing everything down. Some students may learn with these old methods, but a lot of them stay behind because they probably get bored or they have questions they’re afraid to ask and they just keep them for themselves. Obviously this old fashioned teaching technique is not very helpful to the students’ learning. Through the last decades, education has evolved in a positive way; claiming that the students need to get involved in the class by asking questions and sharing comments related to it. Now-a-days, teachers are working to balance their interference with the students’ involvement in the class, and the results have turned out to be positive for both sides. The teacher shouldn’t just stand in front of the class and explain the whole lesson while students just sit there and listen, and it cannot be the other way around, were the students are left on their own and figure out everything for themselves. Students need the guidance of someone who knows a little bit more than they do. If students are doing things wrong the teacher must lead them into the right path in order for them to be successful learners, and if they are doing a good job with their learning this must certainly be acknowledged by the teacher so they can feel motivated to keep working hard, and hopefully learn all they need to learn. The roles in the classroom have changed, students need to participate actively while the teacher provides the information but also induces the students to think a little bit more on their own and share what they’re thinking with the rest of a class. When students get involved in the class, they don’t get bored and hopefully they will really learn what needs to be learned, therefore they will feel encouraged and important to the class. An excellent teaching technique in which the students get involved in the class while the teacher monitors their learning is eliciting, and there are certainly many benefits for both the students and the teacher when this technique is applied in a class.

Eliciting is defined as the process of drawing out information, ideas, language, etc from the students. This means that when the teacher is giving a class, he/she asks questions (or uses gestures) related to the lesson and students will answer that question by sharing their opinion, comments, and possible answers to that question. When a teacher elicitates he/she is guiding and inducing students to make a discovery, applying what they have previously learned. Students are really involved in the class and the knowledge acquired through elicitation is more memorable thanks to such involvement.

The teacher’s role in elicitation is of a “guide” that encourages students to speak up, but before they give an answer students think and reflect. The teacher presents an idea and students develop that idea. Then, the teacher takes advantage of the students’ answers in order to lead them to the lesson’s objective. We can elicit language, ideas, feelings, meanings, contexts, memories. The only thing we cannot elicit is a concept or idea that students do not know (something they haven’t experienced, something they cannot relate to previous knowledge).

There are several ways in which eliciting can be presented in a class; this depends on the teacher’s creativity. One of them is pictures or realia. This alternative consists on showing a picture or a real object to the class; the students will answer questions related to what they see. Another way of eliciting is by making students guess by mimicking or making gestures. They will elicit what the teacher is doing. And last but not least, a very interesting way to elicit is to make students imagine situation or with a picture. Students can create stories by looking at those pictures, and they can also predict what will happen in the story and what happened before.

A very good example of eliciting I can think is called “Magic Box.” In this game, the teacher remains silent and uses signs and gestures to elicit words. The teacher does gestures as if he/she were taking out something from a box, then he/she uses his/her body to describe the object that is taken out of the box. Students try to guess what the teacher is modeling through mimic. This game is really fun and it attracts students’ attention.

According to Jim Scrivener, (Learning Teaching: A guidebook for English language teachers) elicitation is based on three principles. The first principle says that students might know more than we give them credit for. This means that students come to school with previous knowledge they get in school or at home, it’s not like they go to school with their heads in blank and the teachers are supposed to fill their heads with information. Students need to think and connect their previous knowledge with new knowledge. The Second principle states that “Starting with what they know is a productive way to begin new work” Eliciting is a good way to review previous lessons because it helps the teacher explain the new content better by making a relationship with the previous content, and students will be encouraged to think on their own and make the connection. The third principle says that involving people in a question-answer movement towards new discoveries is often more effective than simply giving lectures. It’s true that students get bored when the teacher is talking and talking, some students might fall asleep and others may appear as if they were really listening to the class but the truth is that their minds drift away into thinking about something else that has nothing to do with the class. Students need to feel part of the class, they need to be engaged in it and the way we can catch their attention is through elicitation. Teachers who practice elicitation in their classes rarely have problems with their students’ attention and they also have less discipline problems than those who don’t engage their students in the class. We may wonder why and the answer is the following: when the students are being asked to participate they need to be paying attention to what the teacher and the classmates say in case he/she gets a turn to talk otherwise if the student is not paying attention he will not be able to give a decent answer. The teacher should design creative activities that will catch the student’s attention so they can feel interested and feel the desire to participate.

When we are eliciting, we need to provide enough information so the students can participate. To elicit the teacher should plan an activity previewing what vocabulary they will need and maybe the grammar structure that will be used. Hand gestures may be employed to ask students to speak (single student or the whole group). Whenever students contribute with a good response or answer they must be acknowledged by saying correct, very good, thank you. If a good answer is given the teacher must remark that it is correct, perhaps even write in on the blackboard and ask the whole class to repeat it. When students make a mistake they should be corrected. Teachers shouldn’t point out the mistakes; they should only ask for another answer and emphasize which is the correct answer. If students can’t get to the point nor give the right answer the teacher must assume that there are things that need to be reinforced or explained from the beginning. When this happens, the teacher must stop eliciting.

Eliciting provides benefits for the students but also for the teachers. The students get more involved in the class and therefore the information is best stored in their memory. Another thing is that students don’t get bored because these kinds of activities are directed to the whole class and they are all “alert” trying to keep up with the class. Eliciting builds the students’ confidence because they are encouraged to use the language in the classroom, and their opinion is appreciated by the teacher. Like I mentioned before, the benefits are not exclusively for the students, through eliciting, teachers find out what he/she should work on with the students (reinforce or teach from the beginning). Eliciting reduces unnecessary teacher talk and increases student talk.

As a conclusion, we can state that eliciting engages students with the contents of a course through experience. By experience I mean to say that students are participating and reviewing previous lessons, and the teacher is able to introduce new information by connecting it with the previous knowledge acquired. Eliciting is certainly about making connections. Students have to think and figure out things with the aid of the teacher who leads or guides them into discovery. Research and practice prove that eliciting is a very effective technique which enables student-teacher interaction within the classroom. In my personal experience as a student I really enjoy classes when my teachers do eliciting. I pay attention to what’s being said, and at the same time I’m reviewing things I’ve seen before and connecting them with the new information. When my teachers elicit I feel part of the class. Even if I make a mistake when I’m answering to the questions the teacher asks, I know I’ll learn something from it. When my time comes to become a teacher I will keep in mind to elicit with my students, and hopefully this will help them become better thinkers and learn; but also it will help me as a teacher realize what needs to be reinforced and what knowledge is as clear as water.





Culture and Language Go Hand In Hand




And last but not least, the final essay for my Culture and Language Class. I think this essay was really interesting to write, I had to state my opinion about how culture and language cannot be separated, their importance on English Language Teaching (as well as when learning any other language), and how culture complements language and viceversa. :) I don't want to brag, but I think I did a good job on this essay :) It's really long .... I couldn't help it...it was a very interesting subject for me :).



Building Awareness and Practical Skill to Facilitate Cross-Cultural Communication.

By: Paulina Ortega

INTRODUCTION:
Culture and Language go hand in hand and they cannot be separated because they complement each other simultaneously. Culture is influenced by language and at the same time, language is influenced by culture. When the customs in a speech community change, the language will be affected and it happens the other way around as well. When we learn a second or foreign language, we are adopting a new culture to some extent.

The term culture can be defined in many different ways; and we must take into consideration features such as the form, speech acts, rhetorical structure of texts, socio-cultural behaviors, and ways in which knowledge is obtained and transmitted. Culture can be expressed through our body language, gestures, concepts of time, hospitality customs, and even expressions of friendship. All these aspects and factors mentioned reflect the cultural norms established and accepted by a particular society. The tight relationship between Culture and Language use influences how language must be taught and therefore learnt. Everyone is part of a culture, and we are influenced by it and we play our part in our society according to what is expected of us in our culture.

Teaching about the grammar structure, the vocabulary, how to read is not just be given as plain instruction of those structures. We need to teach our students the reasons beyond the forms and the use. We need our students to know how to express themselves in particular situations and how to behave in those situations. Students need to know about the culture of the language that is being learned and of course they get benefits from receiving this kind of cultural instruction besides the regular linguistic instruction on the language they are learning. Some examples of the benefits are that they will be able to communicate efficiently with Native Speakers and also avoid uncomfortable situations due to misunderstandings or ignorance of what shouldn't be done.

Hymes says that learning the culture of the language a person is learning is very important because culture influences the values of the community, everyday interaction, the rules applied to behavior and speech, and the sociocultural expectations of an individual's roles.
"An ability to recognize and employ culturally appropriate ways of communicating in speech or writing allows learners to make choices with regard to linguistic, pragmatic and other behaviors."

For L2 purposes, the term "culture" includes in its definition: the literature, the arts, the architecture, and the history of a particular society; yet we may include as well dress style, cuisine, customs, festivals and other traditions. All these aspects mentioned are part of what we know as the "VISIBLE CULTURE".

But Culture is more than those aspects we can easily perceive. Sociocultural norms, world views (philosophy), beliefs, assumptions, and value systems complete the definition of culture. We can define these aspects as the "Invisible Culture".

Scollon and Scollon say that what is acceptable, appropriate, and expected in one's behavior is acquired during the process of socialization and it becomes an inseparable part of an individual's identity. The roles of the teacher and the students in a classroom are based on the rules and perceptions (of what should be and what shouldn’t be) of a particular society or culture.
It’s not that easy to teach about Culture because it cannot go separate from the L2 instruction. When the learners know about the culture of the L2 or FL, they develop their competence in that language. Therefore, they will be able to communicate with the native speakers of the language.

Teachers must investigate the needs of the learner and establish learning goals in L2/FL. These two steps will help the teacher define what aspects of the culture will be taught in order to satisfy the needs and goals of the learner.


Many important aspects of the culture can be taught within the classroom. Teachers can explain about the culture at the same time they are explaining certain language features. For example they can talk about history using the simple past tense. There are many creative ways to combine the cultural information with the language skills that need to be developed (reading, writing, reading comprehension, vocabulary, speaking). An important benefit of teaching culture is to provide the learners with the knowledge an the tools that will help them interact effectively in the L2/FL environments and social contexts.


Studies have shown that despite they have lived in English-speaking countries for several years, some non-native students, do not always follow the rules of politeness which are expected from their L2 communities. The possible excuses for this are that maybe these learners do not always understand what is expected from them or maybe they don’t have access to the necessary sociocultural concepts that are ubiquitously manifested in the academy. Once clear example is that in English Speaking cultures time is very important and people are expected to arrive in time, but unfortunately in our culture time is not respected and people tend to be late.

The cultural expectations from a particular speech community are acquired through socialization. These expectations and rules are defined as “behavioral prescriptions,” by Stewart. When learners interact with non-native speakers of the L2/FL; they are only exposed to the outcomes of linguistic and other types of behaviors and are restricted from the causes.

The outcomes are the results but the causes are the reasons that explain why one gets certain response from another person when they do something.

It is very important for learners to make observations when they are learning the L2/FL. They must notice the native speakers’ behavior and reactions and that can be achieved through interaction with them.

Through the ability of identification of sociocultural purposes of L2 linguistic behaviors in a community, students are allowed to identify cultural patterns in situations, to understand how they are realized in other situations, and to anticipate their manifestations in the future.

The most important things we should consider when interacting are the gender of the speaker or the hearer, their respective ages, similarities or differences in their social status, their social distance, the purpose of the speech events, the time available for the interaction and its physical setting. The learner must be aware that he won’t address or use the same words he would use when talking to a friend his/her age than he would when talking to a Teacher.

In case the student is not exposed to native speakers’ live interactions, he might observe the interactions presented in T.V. shows or movies. These are very good resources for observation of the use of the L2/FL because the student can learn a lot while having fun.

The teacher should provide activities that are interesting and enjoyable for the learners. An activity suggested in the copies, is one in which students can make “field research” in cafeterias, restaurants, stores and libraries. Students can take notes and observe the behavior of the native speakers. Another thing they can do is to compare the politeness and conversational routines in the learner’s L1 to those found in English-language materials like movie clips, recorded audio and video interviews, taped dialogues that come with a text, or even test material).

If students are in a high-intermediate level, teachers should suggest expanded and more sophisticated activities or interactions. For example for the observation activity they could go to an office, a hallway a street to investigate various speech acts such as making appointments, seeking clarifications, or responding to requests. Students can even participate actively in role plays, skits or mini-plays focusing on the linguistic features they are learning as well as in the context they can be applied to.

When it comes to teaching linguistic and social features of the speech acts, teachers can provide routines using the language emphasizing on the different use depending on the social status of the speaker and the hearer, and other situational factors. Students can also be taught how to use body language and gestures to express themselves.

Thomas says that when there is a failure in the interaction between the native and the non-native speaker it leads to sociopragmatic failure, uncomfortable breakdowns in communication, and stereotyping of the non-native speaker. She points out that non-native speakers do not do these mistakes on purpose and they don’t mean to offend the native speaker.

The pragmatic function (sociocultural purpose) of speech acts such as requests, apologies, compliments, and complaints can be found in practically every curriculum for teaching speaking (no matter the language). The linguistic form of speech acts and conversational routines is one of the most easily accessible and ubiquitous areas of teaching L2 speaking. The pragmatic function of these expressions is the same but the speaker’s choice of form may cause different responses from the hearer. That’s why the learner must learn which the most polite ways to say things are, and in what social context they are best applied.

What is considered more appropriate to say in a certain situation is determined by the sociocultural variables that are usually not addressed in explicit instruction.

“The sociocultural variables that can make a perfectly acceptable expression unacceptable in different interactions or settings reflect the invisible aspects of L1 or L2 culture that do not easily lend themselves to textbook exercises or listings of expressions. Nonetheless, it is the sociocultural features such as gender, age and the sociocultural status of the participants in the interaction that can create a pragmatic failure.”

The students must know the difference when they are going to talk to someone who is older than the way they would address someone their age. They need to know that they can use less formal expressions to interact with their friends and formal expressions when addressing a teacher or when they are facing a business or professional context.

In Conduct field observations and experiments learners are able to acknowledge the different kinds of politeness and the degree of politeness used in determined social contexts. ESL learners can ask their native speaker friends to evaluate their degree of politeness entailed in each of the conversational openers and explain the factors that make one expression "softer" or more appropriate than another. That way, learners will notice the specific words or constructions that make an expression more polite than the other. Also they will learn the right question to use and which are the cases in which they are allowed to be less polite. The results of these observations may be discussed in small teams and with the help of the teacher the students will be able to discover the linguistic, pragmatic and situational features in the utterance. Students can apply the new utterances learned in role plays or skits.


"Another important charateristic of real-life interactions in determining the pragmatic force of expressions used in daily interactions." This means we need to distinguish the different interaction purposes of a linguistic form in order to communicate effectively in the L2/FL. The student must know which is the purpose of a certain sentence, how and when should that sentence be used.

"Appropiate and inappropriate notions in academic written discourse in English is highly conventionalized." In order to be successful when writing in English, one must take into consideration features such as orgaization, rhethorical support and avoid repeating information.

EFL learners must be taught that plagiarism is a very serious issue in writing. In English they respect the author's rights so anyone is allowed to copy what another person has written. Students must be taught how to quote or at least how to use their own words to explain what they have read.


When students are learning to write, the teachers usually provide them with paragraphs and essays that model which is the correct form and organization of written expression in English. It may be really hard for students to learn all this forms at the beginning, but hopefully they will improve their writing as they practice. L1 writing has a big influence on they way they write and students have a hard time trying to see the difference between the structure used in English and the one used in L1. Students tend to write following the same rules they would when they are writing in their L1. In the course of writing instruction, learners are faced with the outcomes and not the causes of the L2, sociocultural norms and conventions and that makes it even harder for them to apply what they are expected.

Therefore, we can conclude that writing really reflects one's culture. The native speakers of English may find their rules for writing as natural and normal, but the non-native speakers find it abnormal, unnatural and sometimes even wrong because they already have a mental idea of how writing should be provided by their L1 instruction.

Whenever the teacher provides the students with explanations on why members of a particular culture do things in a certain way, the students “get a larger picture of the culture and they are able to understand and apply the rules.”

A big issue when it comes to writing in English is that some students are not able to provide enough supporting details to reinforce their thesis statement and the main idea of their paragraph, but it is important to mention that this has a reason. In some cultures it is believed that giving too many details is excessive and unnecessary and in others they may consider this as lack of humility. That's why teachers need to explain what L2 readers should expect.

There are two main kinds of reading materials provided in ESL/EFL classes. The first one is simple readings included in the textbooks and the second one includes authentic materials with different degrees of difficulty. In most classes, the textbooks are used all the time to develop and improve the learner's reading skills and vocabulary. I think teachers have the obligation to promote reading in the FL/L2. They should recommend their students to read at home anything that catches their interest so they can learn new vocabulary on their own that will help them improve in many ways. The truth is that reading is a very important tool, which will help students improve in the L2/FL.

"ESL/EFL textbooks present a limited and controlled range of ideas, vocabulary items and culturally-dependent concepts." It is not enough to read the contents of the textbook. That’s why it is suggested for teachers to use authentic texts as a complementary resource for students to learn vocabulary and even cultural facts about the ordinary life of the people of the speech community

Students may present trouble in making inferences from a text within the textbook and also problems in comprehension. They need the guidance of the teacher in order to understand, they cannot just be expected to understand everything they read because the teacher needs to tell them about the meaning of some idioms and expressions that may appear in the texts that don't mean literally what is written. Teachers must provide a considerable amount of background teaching about text interpretation and identification of the main idea.

Teachers really need to invest time on teaching reading comprehension, for the students may not get the meaning of what is implied in the text right away. Students need guidance until they are able to do things on their own, but the teacher must monitor the students’ progress.

An important task assigned to the teachers is that they should be prepared with the knowledge about culture and the structure of the language he/she is teaching. This means that besides mastering the grammar and the skills of the language, teachers need to know a great deal about the culture they are learning. They must know about the visible and the invisible culture because they will need to explain to their students the reasons why they must use certain structures in certain contexts. Students are always making questions about the culture and they must be provided with the answers that will make their comprehension of the L2/FL easier and develop their proficiency when communicating with native speakers. A teacher that isn’t prepared in the knowledge of the culture is not going to help the students very much. That’s why teachers must read and receive instruction on the culture of a language before teaching it.

Teachers must take into consideration the cultural backgrounds of the students in the class so he/she’s able to understand why they tend to behave in a certain way. Students reflect their own culture and some students for example are very quiet, while others participate way too much.




Finally, teachers should take advantage of tools and activities that combine culture and language. These activities certainly benefit the students. They need fun activities where they can learn and hopefully the knowledge will stick in their long term memory. Some activities suggested are interviews to native speakers, questionnaires about culture (in the students L1), and in also use materials such as home videos, movie clips, videotape excepts from news and T.V. shows.

About this last activity, my teammates and I agreed that when students watch a movie or a T.V. show they learn a lot about the culture of a speech community. These resources are best when they present daily life situations. We think that the sitcom F.R.I.E.N.D.S. is an excellent resource for students to learn about the American culture. F.R.I.E.N.D.S. presents real life situations and the behaviors/reactions people show when facing this situations. They talk about jobs, relationships, friendships, neighbors; the things we are all exposed to all the time. When watching this wonderful show, the learner can be aware of the behavior accepted in the American society and culture but also of what shouldn’t be done (in most cases). My teammates and I also concluded that the vocabulary is used in that show is very simple so all levels will be able to understand what they say. By watching F.R.I.E.N.D.S, students will learn while they are having a great time laughing at the jokes presented in the show.

Conclusion
As a conclusion, we can say that culture and language are connected like the pieces in a puzzle; one cannot be whole without the other. Teachers must provide their students with the cultural and linguistic knowledge to reach language proficiency. When we decide to study a language we are deciding to adopt a new culture in our lives. Students must be attentive observers in order to perceive how should they behave and which are the most polite and impolite ways to say things in the language they are learning, so they can prevent uncomfortable situations when interacting with native speakers. It is true that students may struggle when learning the culture, but as long as the teacher guides them they will improve. That’s why teachers must be really prepared with the knowledge and be patient with the learners. Teachers must provide fun activities that will help the students develop their language proficiency at the same time they get to know the culture of the speech community better.




Events during the 80s and 90s


This time I had to choose an important event that took place during these wonderful decades. I chose to talk about Bill Clinton's Presidency.
Events of the 1980s -90s
The Positive Side of Bill Clinton’s Administration (1993-2001)

by: Paulina Rebeca Ortega Silva



William Jefferson Clinton, representative of the Democrat Party, won the Presidential Elections in 1992 against George H.W. Bush and H. Ross Perot. It had been a while since a Democrat had been a president of the United States. His success restored the Democrat’s power over the political charges in the American government. Bill Clinton took over his charge as the President of the United States in 1993 and left in 2001. I think that Bill Clinton’s policies improved the life of the Americans. I would like to say that I support the idea that during his administration the United States had a big economical growth, better living conditions, and had the role of peace promoting nation.

According to the statistics, the United States experienced the longest period of economic growth in its history, thanks to the international trading treaties Clinton signed, the budget reforms and the peace dividend following the end of the cold war of Russia and the United States. In 1993, Bill Clinton signed the North American Free Trading Agreement (NAFTA) with Canada and Mexico. This treaty reduced the tariffs and created free trading block between these three North American countries. Thanks to the NAFTA, the exports from the United States to Canada and Mexico increased, and therefore, this favored the American Economy. During this same year, Bill Clinton signed a treaty with the Pacific Rim Nations. On November 1993, he sighed in Seattle a treaty called the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). This treaty removed the boundaries for trading between these Asian countries and the United States. Bill Clinton also signed other international trading agreements. No wonder this was a period of economic growth for the United States. Unfortunately, the benefits from these treaties were not equal to all the countries involved because the United States was the one that got the greatest benefits. We have our clearest example right here in our country: the exports from Mexico to the United States were had the best quality, but the Mexicans stayed with the not so good quality products. So if the Mexicans wanted to acquire good quality products they had to travel to the United States and buy the same exported products, and once again favor the American Economy. We can conclude that all this treaties were the main reason why the American economy kept growing throughout Clinton’s administration.

On the first months of his administration, Bill Clinton signed the Family and Medical leave act. This act allowed employees unpaid leave for pregnancy or other serious medical conditions. Obviously, the welfare of the American population was strongly related to the growth of the economy, because people were able to buy houses, cars and other things. Also, there were a lot of job offers because of all those free trading treaties and also the salaries increased. There was also a reduction of taxes during his administration. These are the reasons which I consider improved the living conditions in the United States.

Bill Clinton traveled to many countries around the world to promote peace and human rights. Ever since his youth, Bill Clinton had fought for his ideals of justice and peace. During the 1960’s he protested against the Viet Nam War and he was in favor of women’s right to choose and equal rights. He didn’t support the Gulf War and he tried to promote human rights in the countries where there was injustice. He sent his troops to African countries not to fight, but to provide the poor people with food and clothing. He came several times to Mexico and had a good relationship with our presidents (Carlos Salinas de Gortari, Ernesto Zedillo and Vicente Fox). I read that he even advised president Zedillo when we experienced the peso’s devaluation. I think there was less racism during his presidency and people were more open-minded about foreign tourists who visited the United States. As a person who goes several times a year to the United States I’ve noticed the change now that Bill Clinton is no longer the president. The men who check your visa in the border were friendlier back then and they didn’t check you as much. (Of course maybe this is mostly due to the terrorism experienced with the current President of the United States, but that is another matter for another essay, I guess.) Also, there was less discrimination towards the migrant workers in that country. It was easier for them to fix their papers and become American Citizens and work legally. I didn’t feel there were as much prejudices about Mexican migrants as there are today with all those boarder patrols. Back then, people didn’t make a fuss about building a wall to mark the frontier between Mexico and the United States. People weren’t as paranoid as they are today about a terrorist attack. He refused many times to use military force to solve issues between nations, instead Bill Clinton signed many peace treaties. He promoted peace within Palestine and Israel. I guess all this earned Clinton popularity among the citizens in the United States but also with the people from other countries. We like him better than President Bush.

Personally, I think Bill Clinton did a good job as a president. His policies certainly affected the Americans but in a positive way, I guess. Like I mentioned before, the American Economy experienced a progressive increase during his administration thanks to all those economic treaties he signed with foreign countries. People got better jobs and permissions. I think the best part of his administration was that he promoted peace and human rights. He had a good relationship with most of the presidents and he avoided the use of military forces to solve the conflicts between nations. We can say he meddled in other countries’ business but he had good intentions. Back then, dialogue was the first choice to solve a problem and usually nations would establish an agreement. When Clinton was the President of the United States, the country experienced economical progress, better living conditions for the citizens and somehow less racism than now-a-days.

The Forest Gump Essay

We were assigned to watch the movie Forest Gump and write an essay about the most important events that appeared that took place during the 1960's and 1970's. Originally written : September 18, 2006.

Life in the 60s
(How it changed the American Way of Living)

By: Paulina Ortega

A great deal of the Forrest Gump story takes place during the 60s, a decade when a lot of important events that changed the American culture, took place. In the movie we can see there was still racism, (especially against black people); we can also see Forrest meets President John F. Kennedy before his assassination, the American soldiers that enlisted the army and fought in the Viet Nam War in contrast with the “hippies” who protested against the war.

When Forest Gump was in College, he met President John F. Kennedy in a party. A lot of people admired this president because he did a lot for his people and he wanted to do more. Unfortunately he was murdered and this was scandals that lead to the instability of the United States. People no longer trusted the government blindly.

In a part of the movie, when Forest Gump was in College I heard a comment against African-Americans, and the truth is that in those times white-bred people didn’t get along very much with them. These African Americans had many prohibitions and were isolated from society. During those decades, they were fighting for their rights as American Citizens. In the movie it is said that they were going to accept some African-Americans into the army for the Viet Nam war. Thanks to their constant fight for their rights the African-Americans achieved their goal to be considered equals and have the same rights and privileges as the “White” people. It’s true that the laws have changed from then, they say all men are equal no matter their color, their religion or status, yet I I think there is still quite a lot of racism in the United States. By law people are no longer secluded from society.

What I think was more emphasized during the movie was the two position of the Viet Nam war. A lot of young men were recruited and trained to fight in the Viet Nam War, while others decided to rebel and protest against this war.

Forrest Gump was one of the young men who faced the horrors of the Viet Nam War. The battles were bloody and lots of soldiers died, while others who lived were traumatized by the horrible things they had to see and live at the battlefield. Forrest’s best friend, Bubba died fighting and the lieutenant lost both of his legs. Forrest’s role in that war was more likely of a true hero than a fighter. He was the one who took care of the Lieutenant’s and made sure he was safe, although the lieutenant wanted to die, because he wanted to die “with honor” fighting until the end, and not live to be “useless” like he thought. The feeling of frustration caused a lot of people to become mentally insane or even commit suicide. I think it became more common to hear about mental institutions and the suicide rate has increased.

Now on the other hand, when Forrest goes to the White House for his medals, he finds his childhood best friend Jenny, who was protesting against the war. She was one in thousands of young men and women who didn’t want there to be a war. It was a national movement called “hippies”. Unfortunately, hippies stood up for their beliefs in a way that is not exactly the best way to do things. They marched carrying posters while singing songs against war, (which is the positive side). However, they also got together in concerts where they had all kinds of negative excesses. I believe their protests seemed to be more like an excuse to consume all kinds of drugs and practice some immoral acts, which really hadn’t much to do with their anti-war position. Instead of being positive, the hippies forgot their true initial ideals and let themselves be corrupted by drug abuse and other excesses. Among the hippies, there were really intelligent and creative people who just wasted away their lives with drugs. I think that this where the times were drug abuse got stronger in the United States, and we can also mention that the illegal trading of these harmful substances became more common. I don’t remember if it’s mentioned in the movie, but this is when more cases of AIDS appeared because of the sharing of needles and the orgies the hippies did back then. Sadly the use of drugs has increased, the suicidal rates, and people do protests that alter the peace and order in a certain place. It is important to mention, that thanks to the hippies people felt more free to express their disagreement about political and social issues that affected them. If people do not agree with the decisions made by the government or the people with power they protest, they try to make a difference, and they do not just cross their arms and watch injustice pass before their eyes.


To conclude, the 60s were a decade of revolution and evolution in the American way of life. African Americans earned their rights, people finally stood up for their beliefs even if it was against the government, and drug abuse and trading became more common. Before the 60s people used to believe in the government, but they finally opened their eyes and saw for themselves that the government doesn’t always tell the truth and the people who work there abuse their power and sometimes do not make the best decisions for a country, like war for instance.

The Viet Nam War Essay

This was the first essay I did for the Culture and Language II class.

The Viet-Nam War
By Paulina Ortega


The Viet Nam War was a long war that lasted around 15 years. The United States got involved in the war by selling them the weapons and also by sending their soldiers to fight. During the 60’s, the young Americans did not support the war because it was unfair to them, so they made protests in order to convince the government to stop the war. Even so, the war went on and many people died.

Viet Nam had been a French Colony. After WWII, the some Vietnamese wanted to become an independent country so they began riots to get rid of the French and of the Japanese invaders during WWII. In 1954, the Vietnamese succeeded under the command of Ho Chih Minh (a communist activist). This is when the Democratic Republic of Viet Name is established in the North of the country. Meanwhile the French were still in South Viet Nam. When they wanted to unify the country with elections, they were blocked by the South. Soon, the Vietnamese from the North turned against the Vietnamese from the South.

As we all know, those were the times of the cold war between the United States of America and the Soviet Union. So, in the Viet Nam war these two countries took opposite sides. The Democratic Republic of Viet Nam in the North was supported by the Russians and the Chinese, while the United States, Australia and New Zealand were with the South (Republic of Viet Nam).

The first intervention of the United States was by sending military counselors; but it became more “personal” when these counselors were being attacked. Then they sent their troops to fight. More than half a million soldiers were sent.

The battles were very cruel. All kinds of weapons (except nuclear) were used.

Young people of those times didn’t want the war. They were aware that innocent people were dying. These young people got together and made peaceful protests with the goal of persuading the government to sign peace and remove their troops from Viet Nam. They wrote songs and they fought hard for their beliefs.

In the end, the Vietnamese became a known independent country. But the lives of the people who died in battle were never recovered.

Bibliography
http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/vietnam/index-1961.html
http://www.datesofhistory.com/VietNam-War,-2ndUSA.general.html

Extras


I will post all the work I did in the other subjects for my third semester.

I will include the essays for Culture and Language II, as well as the work for Introduction to Teaching Practice and Theories of Language Acquisition and Learning. I will also upload the work we did in Albert´s class just in case :)

jueves, 7 de diciembre de 2006

Speaking Practice



This semester, I recorded my voice reading some articles from the Speak Up Magazines. :(These articles are very interesting by the way) Sometimes I tried speaking with an English accent, but most of the time I used the Standard American Accent. It was fun, but also I think that reading out loud really improves our fluency in the target language.


I attended like 7,8 or 9 times to the Conversation Club with Ana, and I enjoyed them because we would always talk about very interesting subjects.